Our Services
FAQ Recent News About VLG Contact Us VSO/VSR Resources

8070 La Jolla Shores Dr. #437 La Jolla, CA. 92037

Bulletin: Citation Correction – Challenging C&P Psych Reports based on Physical Observation

Published by


Challenging unfavorable C&P psych reports based on observations made during the examination??

We have all seen, from time to time, a big disconnect between what a VA C&P examination report says about a claimant’s psychiatric symptoms and what is written in treatment records and in the claimant’s statements.

Take, for instance, a claimant who has been seeing a treating psychiatrist for years,with reports of severe and recurring nightmares, flashbacks, intrusive thoughts and low GAF scores. On the day of his C & P examination, however, the claimant dresses neatly, appears calm and plays down the severity of his symptoms. In short, the claimant puts ona happy face for his examination. The VA examiner will write what he observes, and,accordingly, his report will not reflect much disability.

This is where a VSO, as the claimant’s representative, can provide helpful advocacy.

The VSO needs to persuade the rating specialist or the Decision Review Officer that,in this case, the one-time, examination does not accurately represent the claimant’s true disability picture. In other words, the fluctuating nature of the claimant’s psychiatric illness must be measured over time, (by the treatment records and by the claimant’s reported history), not just at the moment of the examination.

The VA Regulation 38 C.F.R. § 4.126(a) states:

When evaluating a mental disorder, the rating agency shall consider the frequency,severity,and duration of psychiatric symptoms, the length of remissions, and the veteran’s capacity for adjustment during periods of remission. The rating agency shall assign an evaluation based on all the evidence of record that bears on occupational and social impairment rather than solely on the examiner’s assessment of the level of disability at the moment of the examination.

You can also point to:
Davis v. Principi, 276 F.3d 1341, 1345 (Fed.Cir.2002) which states that because”psychiatric disorders abate and recur,” the VA is obligated to evaluate them “not by reference to isolated periods of activity or remission, but by assessing the effects of the disease or injury over the history of the condition.” Also, Punzio v. Astrue, 630 F.3d 704, 710 (7th Cir. 2011) states that “a person who suffers from a mental illness will have better days and worse days, so a snapshot of any single moment says little about her overall condition”.

"After several years of struggling with the VA and not much to show for it but frustration, your law group was a sign of relief. You guys reduced the level of stress significantly, knowing that I finally had someone on my side who understood how to work/deal with the VA system."

  • James H.|El Cajon, CA


"Best decision I have ever made was calling VLG for help. Mark Lippman walked me through everything from start to finish and without his help I would still be waiting on my claim. So thankful more than words can explain. By far the best lawyers I ever talked to or used or even heard people talk about. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. You helped me more than I ever dreamed of."

  • Brian H.|North Carolina

    Awarded $92,000

Need Help with
Your Disability Appeal?

Get Free Consultation

  • We represent cases at all levels on appeal
  • We’ll obtain additional medical opinion evidence, when needed
  • We’ll arrange for Vocational Rehab experts to assist, when needed
  • Free Consultation

"Thank you to the Veterans Law Group for successfully resolving my appeals claim with the Veterans Administration. After two plus years of aggravation and jumping through VA hoops, I had all but given up. VLG assured me that because of the documented proof they had submitted for my case, a positive outcome was near. Due to their persistency, my case was settled and I received my long awaited justification. A definite life changer! Thanks again to the VLG and I would highly recommend their firm to anyone!"

  • Vernon H.

    Kansas City, MO

Awarded $44,000